ABSTRACT
Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) is an important prognostic marker and its classification helps the cardiologist in the therapeutic decision-making process. The most commonly used cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) classification has not been validated for the Brazilian population. Objective: To elaborate a CRF classification using a Brazilian sample and to compare it with the American Heart Association (AHA), Cooper and UNIFESP classifications. Methods: A total of 6,568 healthy subjects were analyzed through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). They were distributed by sex and the following age groups (years): 7-12, 13-19, 20-79 (per decades) and > 80 years. After measurement of the VO2peak, participants were distributed into quintiles of CRF in very poor, poor, moderate, high and very high (AEMA Table). The CRF classifications by AEMA, AHA, Cooper, and UNIFESP were compared using the Wilcoxon, Kappa and concordance percentages. Results: VO2peak presented an inverse and moderate correlation with age considering both sexes (R = -0.488, p < 0.001). All paired comparisons between CRF classification systems showed differences (p < 0.001) and disagreement percentage - AEMA versus AHA (k = 0.291, 56.7%), AEMA versus Cooper (k = 0.220, 62.4%) and AEMA versus UNIFESP (k = 0.201, 63.9 %). Conclusion: The AEMA table showed important discrepancies in the classification of CRF when compared to other tables widely used in our setting. Because it was obtained from a large sample of the Brazilian population, the AEMA table should be preferred over other classification systems in our population
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Brazil , Sampling Studies , Cardiorespiratory Fitness , Oxygen Consumption , Echocardiography/methods , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Exercise , Sex Factors , Age Factors , Electrocardiography/methods , Exercise Test/methods , Population HealthABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) has been gaining importance as a method of functional assessment in Brazil and worldwide. In its most frequent applications, CPET consists in applying a gradually increasing intensity exercise until exhaustion or until the appearance of limiting symptoms and/or signs. The following parameters are measured: ventilation; oxygen consumption (VO2); carbon dioxide production (VCO2); and the other variables of conventional exercise testing. In addition, in specific situations, pulse oximetry and flow-volume loops during and after exertion are measured. The CPET provides joint data analysis that allows complete assessment of the cardiovascular, respiratory, muscular and metabolic systems during exertion, being considered gold standard for cardiorespiratory functional assessment.1-6 The CPET allows defining mechanisms related to low functional capacity that can cause symptoms, such as dyspnea, and correlate them with changes in the cardiovascular, pulmonary and skeletal muscle systems. Furthermore, it can be used to provide the prognostic assessment of patients with heart or lung diseases, and in the preoperative period, in addition to aiding in a more careful exercise prescription to healthy subjects, athletes and patients with heart or lung diseases. Similarly to CPET clinical use, its research also increases, with the publication of several scientific contributions from Brazilian researchers in high-impact journals. Therefore, this study aimed at providing a comprehensive review on the applicability of CPET to different clinical situations, in addition to serving as a practical guide for the interpretation of that test.
RESUMO O teste cardiopulmonar de exercício (TCPE) vem ganhando importância crescente como método de avaliação funcional tanto no Brasil quanto no Mundo. Nas suas aplicações mais frequentes, o teste consiste em submeter o indivíduo a um exercício de intensidade gradativamente crescente até a exaustão ou o surgimento de sintomas e/ou sinais limitantes. Neste exame se mensura a ventilação (VE), o consumo de oxigênio (VO2), a produção de gás carbônico (VCO2) e as demais variáveis de um teste de exercício convencional. Adicionalmente, podem ser verificadas, em situações específicas, a oximetria de pulso e as alças fluxo-volume antes, durante e após o esforço. A análise integrada dos dados permite a completa avaliação dos sistemas cardiovascular, respiratório, muscular e metabólico no esforço, sendo considerado padrão-ouro na avaliação funcional cardiorrespiratória.1-6 O TCPE permite definir mecanismos relacionados à baixa capacidade funcional, os quais podem ser causadores de sintomas como a dispneia, correlacionando-os com alterações dos sistemas cardiovascular, pulmonar e musculoesquelético. Também pode ser de grande aplicabilidade na avaliação prognóstica em cardiopatas, pneumopatas e em pré-operatório, além de auxiliar na prescrição mais criteriosa do exercício em sujeitos normais, em atletas, em cardiopatas e em pneumopatas. Assim como ocorre com o uso clínico, a pesquisa nesse campo também cresce e várias contribuições científicas de pesquisadores nacionais são publicadas em periódicos de alto fator de impacto. Sendo assim, o objetivo deste documento é fornecer uma revisão ampla da aplicabilidade do TCPE nas diferentes situações clínicas, bem como servir como guia prático na interpretação desse teste propedêutico.
Subject(s)
Humans , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Exercise Test/standards , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Prognosis , Spirometry , Pulmonary Circulation , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Exercise Test/methods , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Background: The equations predicting maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max or peak) presently in use in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) softwares in Brazil have not been adequately validated. These equations are very important for the diagnostic capacity of this method. Objective: Build and validate a Brazilian Equation (BE) for prediction of VO2peak in comparison to the equation cited by Jones (JE) and the Wasserman algorithm (WA). Methods: Treadmill evaluation was performed on 3119 individuals with CPET (breath by breath). The construction group (CG) of the equation consisted of 2495 healthy participants. The other 624 individuals were allocated to the external validation group (EVG). At the BE (derived from a multivariate regression model), age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and physical activity level were considered. The same equation was also tested in the EVG. Dispersion graphs and Bland-Altman analyses were built. Results: In the CG, the mean age was 42.6 years, 51.5% were male, the average BMI was 27.2, and the physical activity distribution level was: 51.3% sedentary, 44.4% active and 4.3% athletes. An optimal correlation between the BE and the CPET measured VO2peak was observed (0.807). On the other hand, difference came up between the average VO2peak expected by the JE and WA and the CPET measured VO2peak, as well as the one gotten from the BE (p = 0.001). Conclusion: BE presents VO2peak values close to those directly measured by CPET, while Jones and Wasserman differ significantly from the real VO2peak. .
Fundamento: As equações que predizem o consumo máximo de oxigênio (leia-se VO2máx ou pico) utilizadas em softwares de teste cardiopulmonar de exercício (TCPE) no Brasil não foram validadas e têm importância fundamental no algoritmo diagnóstico desse exame. Objetivo: Construir e validar uma equação derivada de população brasileira (EB) para predição do VO2, comparando-a com a equação citada por Jones (EJ) e com o algoritmo de Wasserman (AW). Métodos: Foram avaliados, pelo TCPE, 3.119 indivíduos aparentemente saudáveis. Destes, 2.495 pertenceram ao grupo de construção (GC) e 624 foram alocados de forma aleatória no grupo de validação (GV). Na EB consideraram-se idade, gênero, índice de massa corporal (IMC) e nível de atividade física, sendo a mesma posteriormente testada no GV. Resultados: No GC, a idade média foi de 42,6 anos, 51,5% eram homens, o IMC médio foi de 27,2, sendo 51,3% sedentários, 44,4% ativos e 4,3% atletas. No GV não houve diferença entre o VO2pico médio medido pelo TCPE (29,92 mL.kg−1.min−1) e pela EB (29,80 mL.kg1.min−1/p = 0,571), sendo observada ótima correlação (0,898). O AW e a EJ tiveram valores médios diferentes do VO2pico medido (p <0,001). O percentual do erro total foi de 18%, 26% e 41% para EB, AW e EJ, respectivamente. A distribuição dos resíduos foi predominantemente negativa no AW (70,67%) e na EJ (87,66%), evidenciando que ambas superestimam os valores médios do VO2pico. Conclusão: A EB apresenta valores de VO2pico muito próximos do valor medido através do TCPE, enquanto o AW e a EJ diferem significativamente do VO2pico real. .
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Algorithms , Exercise Test/methods , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Brazil , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
Background: The importance of measuring blood pressure before morning micturition and in the afternoon, while working, is yet to be established in relation to the accuracy of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Objective: To compare two HBPM protocols, considering 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (wakefulness ABPM) as gold-standard and measurements taken before morning micturition (BM) and in the afternoon (AM), for the best diagnosis of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), and their association with prognostic markers. Methods: After undergoing 24-hour wakefulness ABPM, 158 participants (84 women) were randomized for 3- or 5-day HBPM. Two variations of the 3-day protocol were considered: with measurements taken before morning micturition and in the afternoon (BM+AM); and with post-morning-micturition and evening measurements (PM+EM). All patients underwent echocardiography (for left ventricular hypertrophy - LVH) and urinary albumin measurement (for microalbuminuria - MAU). Result: Kappa statistic for the diagnosis of SAH between wakefulness-ABPM and standard 3-day HBPM, 3-day HBPM (BM+AM) and (PM+EM), and 5-day HBPM were 0.660, 0.638, 0.348 and 0.387, respectively. The values of sensitivity of (BM+AM) versus (PM+EM) were 82.6% × 71%, respectively, and of specificity, 84.8% × 74%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 69.1% × 40% and 92.2% × 91.2%, respectively. The comparisons of intraclass correlations for the diagnosis of LVH and MAU between (BM+AM) and (PM+EM) were 0.782 × 0.474 and 0.511 × 0.276, respectively. Conclusions: The 3 day-HBPM protocol including measurements taken before morning micturition and during work in the afternoon showed the best agreement with SAH diagnosis and the best association with prognostic markers. .
Fundamentos: A importância das medidas da pressão arterial antes do ato miccional matinal e no período da tarde, durante atividades laborativas, na acurácia da monitoração residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) não foi estabelecida. Objetivo: Comparar dois protocolos de MRPA, tendo como padrão-ouro a monitoração ambulatorial da pressão arterial de 24 horas (MAPA-vigília) e avaliando-se as medidas antes do ato miccional e à tarde, para o melhor diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial (HAS), e sua associação com marcadores prognósticos. Métodos: Após realizarem MAPA de 24 horas, os 158 participantes (84 mulheres) foram randomizados para realizar MRPA de três ou cinco dias com posterior crossover. Analisou-se o protocolo de três dias nas seguintes situações: aferições antes do ato miccional matinal e à tarde (AM+MT); e aferições após o ato miccional matinal e à noite (PM+MN). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a ecocardiografia (hipertrofia ventricular esquerda - HVE) e a dosagem de albumina urinária (microalbuminúria - MAU). Resultados: A estatística kappa para diagnóstico de HAS entre MAPA-vigília e MRPA de três dias padrão, MRPA de três dias (AM + MT) e (PM + MN), e MRPA de cinco dias foi de 0,660, 0,638, 0,348 e 0,387, respectivamente. Os valores de sensibilidade de AM+MT versus PM+MN foram 82,6% × 71%, respectivamente, e os de especificidade foram 84,8% × 74%, respectivamente. Os valores preditivos positivos e negativos foram 69,1% × 40% e 92,2% × 91,2%, respectivamente. As comparações das correlações intraclasse para diagnósticos de HVE e MAU, entre AM+MT e PM+MN, foram 0,782 × 0,474 e 0,511 × 0,276, respectivamente. Conclusões: O protocolo de MRPA de três dias ...